Associations between Food Policy Councils and Policies That Support Healthy Food Access: A National Survey of Community Policy Supports.

Food policy councils (FPCs) are one form of community coalition that aims to address challenges to local food systems and enhance availability, accessibility, and affordability of healthy foods for local residents. We used data from the 2014 National Survey of Community-Based Policy and Environmental Supports for Healthy Eating and Active Living, a nationally representative survey of US municipalities (n = 2029), to examine the prevalence of FPCs and cross-sectional associations between FPCs and four types of supports for healthy food access (approaches to help food stores, practices to support farmers markets, transportation-related supports, and community planning documents). Overall, 7.7% of municipalities reported having a local or regional FPC. FPCs were more commonly reported among larger municipalities with ≥50,000 people (29.2%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 21.6, 36.8) and western region municipalities (13.2%, 95% CI: 9.6, 16.8). After multivariable adjustment, municipalities with FPCs had significantly higher odds of having all four types of supports, compared to those without FPCs (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) range: 2.4-3.4). Among municipalities with FPCs (n = 156), 41% reported having a local government employee or elected official as a member, and 46% had a designated health or public health representative. Although FPCs were uncommon, municipalities that reported having a local or regional FPC were more likely to report having supports for healthy food access for their residents.

The role and functions of community health councils in New Zealand's health system: a document analysis.

BACKGROUND: Community/consumer health councils (CHCs) are a relatively new phenomenon in New Zealand. CHCs are usually established within district health boards (DHBs) to help address gaps in community engagement in the health sector. Little is known about the establishment, structure, roles and functioning of these councils. AIM: To undertake a literature review, including grey literature, related to the structure, roles and functioning of CHCs in New Zealand. METHOD: A document analysis of the New Zealand-focused website materials and newspaper articles related to CHCs was conducted. Data were analysed thematically using a qualitative content analysis approach. RESULTS: The search identified 251 relevant web sources and 118 newspaper articles. The main role of the CHCs appeared to be to advise and make recommendations to their respective DHBs (and DHB governance and management structures) about health service planning, delivery and policy. All CHCs discussed in the identified sources comprised different demographic backgrounds and expertise. Although the CHCs were mainly engaged in information sharing and consultation, their influence on DHB decision-making could not be determined from the sources. CONCLUSION: This is the first study of CHCs throughout New Zealand investigating their roles, structure and type of engagement. As the concept is evolving and more CHCs are being established, this information may be useful for future CHCs. With increasing longevity of CHCs in New Zealand, future studies could usefully investigate CHCs' potential to represent the health interests of their local communities, and their influence on DHB decision-making.

Permanent education as an inalienable responsibility of health councils: the current scenario in the Unified Health System.

OBJECTIVE: To verify whether health councils in Brazil carry out permanent education activities for municipal, state and federal district councilors. METHOD: This was a cross-sectional study with secondary data collection in the Health Council Monitoring System (Sistema de Acompanhamento dos Conselhos de Saúde - Siacs) from May to August 2017. The Siacs is publicly accessible and available on the internet. It provides data from thousands of health councils throughout Brazil. Analysis and interpretation of the data were based on the literature and the enacted legislation, particularly Resolution 453/2012 and the National Policy of Permanent Education for Social Control in the Unified Health System (Política Nacional de Educação Permanente para o Controle Social no Sistema Único de Saúde). RESULTS: Despite the fact that Resolution 453/2012 establishes the deliberation, elaboration, support and promotion of permanent education for social control as functions of the councils (in accordance with the guidelines of the National Policy of Permanent Education), approximately 40% of councils do not carry out permanent education. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to strengthen the role of health councils in the elaboration of educational initiatives across the national territory. This includes the allocation of financial resources to increase access to and participation in these initiatives, which would strengthen social control in the Unified Health System. This study emphasizes that the discussion of permanent education is not given sufficient attention in the agendas and routines of health councils. This compromises the effectiveness of councils' monitoring and deliberation of public health policy.

Conselho de saúde e efetividade participativa: estudo sobre avaliação de desempenho / Health councils and participatory effectiveness: a performance assessment study / Consejo de salud y efectividad participativa: estudio sobre la evaluación de desempeño

Resumo: O artigo tem por objetivo apresentar e analisar os resultados de um modelo de avaliação de desempenho de conselhos de saúde. O referencial teórico metodológico está fundamentado no método spidergram, adaptado à realidade dos conselhos de saúde. A matriz avaliativa considerou cinco dimensões de maior influência sobre a participação: autonomia, organização, representatividade, envolvimento comunitário e influência política. Com base na avaliação dos indicadores, foi estimado o valor de desempenho de cada dimensão e localizado no gráfico de cinco eixos. A aplicação da matriz foi realizada no Conselho de Saúde de Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brasil. Utilizou-se análise de documentos, observação das reuniões e entrevistas com 18 conselheiros como técnicas de coleta de dados. Os resultados demonstram nível avançado de autonomia do conselho com condições estruturais adequadas, porém, com limitações na independência financeira. A dimensão organização atingiu nível máximo de desempenho com a realização regular de reuniões, disponibilidade de informações para os conselheiros e funcionamento das comissões temáticas. A representatividade foi a dimensão de pior desempenho, demostrado pela frágil relação dos representantes com as entidades. A dimensão envolvimento comunitário apresentou nível avançado, com elevada participação de conselheiros e não conselheiros às reuniões e perfil de atuação propositivo. A dimensão influência política obteve nível intermediário. Constatou-se elevada influência dos representantes sociais no processo deliberativo e diminuta capacidade de acompanhamento das políticas. A matriz utilizada mostrou-se adequada e viável para a avaliação de desempenho dos conselhos de saúde.

Abstract: The article aims to analyze the results of a performance assessment model for health councils. The theoretical and methodological frame of reference was the spider graph method, adapted to the reality of health councils. The assessment matrix considered five dimensions with the greatest influence on participation: autonomy, organization, representativeness, community involvement, and political influence. Based on assessment of the indicators, we estimated the performance value for each dimension and located it on the five-axis graph. The matrix was applied to the Health Council in Vitória da Conquista, Bahia State, Brazil. We used document analysis, observation of meetings, and interviews with 18 council members as the data collection techniques. The results show an advanced level of the council's autonomy with adequate structural conditions, but with limitations in financial independence. The organizational dimension reached the maximum level of performance, with regular meetings, availability of information for council members, and functioning of thematic commissions. Representativeness was the dimension with the worst performance, displayed by the weak relationship between the representatives and the organizations. The community involvement dimension displayed an advanced level with high participation by council and non-council members in the meetings and action with numerous proposals. The political influence dimension showed intermediate performance. We observed greater influence by the social representatives on the decision-making process and low capacity for follow-up on policies. The matrix proved adequate and feasible for performance assessment of health councils.

Resumen: El objetivo de este artículo es presentar y analizar los resultados de un modelo de evaluación de desempeño en consejos de salud. El marco referencial teórico metodológico se fundamentó en el método spidergram, adaptado a la realidad de los consejos de salud. La matriz evaluativa consideró las cinco dimensiones de mayor influencia sobre la participación: autonomía, organización, representatividad, implicación comunitaria e influencia política. A partir de la evaluación de los indicadores, se estimó el valor del desempeño de cada dimensión y se localizó en el gráfico con cinco ejes. La aplicación de la matriz se realizó en el Consejo de Salud de Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brasil. Se realizó un análisis de documentación, observación de reuniones y entrevistas con 18 consejeros, así como técnicas de recogida de datos. Los resultados demuestran un nivel avanzado de autonomía del consejo con condiciones estructurales adecuadas, aunque con limitaciones en la independencia financiera. La dimensión organización alcanzó el nivel máximo de desempeño con la realización regular de reuniones, disponibilidad de información para los consejeros y funcionamiento de las comisiones temáticas. La representatividad fue la dimensión de peor desempeño, demostrada por la frágil relación de los representantes con las entidades. La dimensión implicación comunitaria presentó un nivel avanzado con una elevada participación de consejeros y no consejeros en las reuniones y perfil de actuación propositivo. La dimensión influencia política obtuvo un nivel intermedio. Se constató una elevada influencia de los representantes sociales en el proceso deliberativo y una diminuta capacidad de seguimiento de las políticas. La matriz utilizada se mostró adecuada y útil para la evaluación de desempeño en los consejos de salud.

Permanent education as an inalienable responsibility of health councils: the current scenario in the Unified Health System

OBJECTIVE: To verify whether health councils in Brazil carry out permanent education activities for municipal, state and federal district councilors. METHOD: This was a cross-sectional study with secondary data collection in the Health Council Monitoring System (Sistema de Acompanhamento dos Conselhos de Saúde - Siacs) from May to August 2017. The Siacs is publicly accessible and available on the internet. It provides data from thousands of health councils throughout Brazil. Analysis and interpretation of the data were based on the literature and the enacted legislation, particularly Resolution 453/2012 and the National Policy of Permanent Education for Social Control in the Unified Health System (Política Nacional de Educação Permanente para o Controle Social no Sistema Único de Saúde). RESULTS: Despite the fact that Resolution 453/2012 establishes the deliberation, elaboration, support and promotion of permanent education for social control as functions of the councils (in accordance with the guidelines of the National Policy of Permanent Education), approximately 40% of councils do not carry out permanent education. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to strengthen the role of health councils in the elaboration of educational initiatives across the national territory. This includes the allocation of financial resources to increase access to and participation in these initiatives, which would strengthen social control in the Unified Health System. This study emphasizes that the discussion of permanent education is not given sufficient attention in the agendas and routines of health councils. This compromises the effectiveness of councils' monitoring and deliberation of public health policy.

Efetividade deliberativa em conselhos municipais de saneamento e de saúde: um estudo em Belo Horizonte-MG e em Belém-PA / Deliberative effectiveness in municipal sanitation and health councils: a study in Belo Horizonte-MG and in Belém-PA

Resumo A deliberação em conselhos municipais de saneamento e de saúde é objeto deste estudo, entendida como processo decisionístico e argumentativo, a partir das formulações de Rousseau, Habermas e Cohen. O objetivo proposto foi avaliar a efetividade da atuação deliberativa dos conselhos de Belo Horizonte (MG) e de Belém (PA). A avaliação abrangeu o estudo de variáveis definidoras do grau de institucionalização dos conselhos e reveladoras da dinâmica do processo deliberativo neles desenvolvido. Foram consultados o Regimento Interno de cada conselho e as atas e resoluções produzidas por eles no triênio 2012-2014. Os resultados revelaram que os quatro conselhos, no período e segundo os critérios de análise definidos, estão distantes do grau de efetividade deliberativa desejado, tendo em vista os propósitos do controle social em saneamento e em saúde, dispostos pela legislação específica de cada área. Mesmo com experiência mais larga, considerando seus anos de exercício pedagógico e democrático de participação, os conselhos de saúde não se mostraram mais efetivos que os neófitos conselhos de saneamento.

Abstract Deliberation in municipal councils of sanitation and health is the object of this study. Deliberation is understood as decision making and argumentative process, from the formulations of Rousseau, Habermas and Cohen. The proposed objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of the deliberative action of the councils of Belo Horizonte (MG) and Belém (PA). The evaluation included the study of variables defining the degree of institutionalization of the councils and revealing the dynamics of the deliberative process developed in them. The internal regulations of each council and the minutes and resolutions produced by them during the 2012-2014 triennium were consulted. The results showed that the four councils, in the period and according to the defined criteria of analysis, are far from the degree of deliberative effectiveness desired, considering the purposes of the social control in sanitation and in health, arranged by the specific legislation of each area. Even with broader experience, considering their years of participatory pedagogical exercise, health councils were no more effective than neophyte sanitation councils.

Deliberative effectiveness in municipal sanitation and health councils: a study in Belo Horizonte-MG and in Belém-PA. / Efetividade deliberativa em conselhos municipais de saneamento e de saúde: um estudo em Belo Horizonte-MG e em Belém-PA.

Deliberation in municipal councils of sanitation and health is the object of this study. Deliberation is understood as decision making and argumentative process, from the formulations of Rousseau, Habermas and Cohen. The proposed objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of the deliberative action of the councils of Belo Horizonte (MG) and Belém (PA). The evaluation included the study of variables defining the degree of institutionalization of the councils and revealing the dynamics of the deliberative process developed in them. The internal regulations of each council and the minutes and resolutions produced by them during the 2012-2014 triennium were consulted. The results showed that the four councils, in the period and according to the defined criteria of analysis, are far from the degree of deliberative effectiveness desired, considering the purposes of the social control in sanitation and in health, arranged by the specific legislation of each area. Even with broader experience, considering their years of participatory pedagogical exercise, health councils were no more effective than neophyte sanitation councils.

A deliberação em conselhos municipais de saneamento e de saúde é objeto deste estudo, entendida como processo decisionístico e argumentativo, a partir das formulações de Rousseau, Habermas e Cohen. O objetivo proposto foi avaliar a efetividade da atuação deliberativa dos conselhos de Belo Horizonte (MG) e de Belém (PA). A avaliação abrangeu o estudo de variáveis definidoras do grau de institucionalização dos conselhos e reveladoras da dinâmica do processo deliberativo neles desenvolvido. Foram consultados o Regimento Interno de cada conselho e as atas e resoluções produzidas por eles no triênio 2012-2014. Os resultados revelaram que os quatro conselhos, no período e segundo os critérios de análise definidos, estão distantes do grau de efetividade deliberativa desejado, tendo em vista os propósitos do controle social em saneamento e em saúde, dispostos pela legislação específica de cada área. Mesmo com experiência mais larga, considerando seus anos de exercício pedagógico e democrático de participação, os conselhos de saúde não se mostraram mais efetivos que os neófitos conselhos de saneamento.

[Health councils and participatory effectiveness: a performance assessment study]. / Conselho de saúde e efetividade participativa: estudo sobre avaliação de desempenho.

The article aims to analyze the results of a performance assessment model for health councils. The theoretical and methodological frame of reference was the spider graph method, adapted to the reality of health councils. The assessment matrix considered five dimensions with the greatest influence on participation: autonomy, organization, representativeness, community involvement, and political influence. Based on assessment of the indicators, we estimated the performance value for each dimension and located it on the five-axis graph. The matrix was applied to the Health Council in Vitória da Conquista, Bahia State, Brazil. We used document analysis, observation of meetings, and interviews with 18 council members as the data collection techniques. The results show an advanced level of the council's autonomy with adequate structural conditions, but with limitations in financial independence. The organizational dimension reached the maximum level of performance, with regular meetings, availability of information for council members, and functioning of thematic commissions. Representativeness was the dimension with the worst performance, displayed by the weak relationship between the representatives and the organizations. The community involvement dimension displayed an advanced level with high participation by council and non-council members in the meetings and action with numerous proposals. The political influence dimension showed intermediate performance. We observed greater influence by the social representatives on the decision-making process and low capacity for follow-up on policies. The matrix proved adequate and feasible for performance assessment of health councils.

O artigo tem por objetivo apresentar e analisar os resultados de um modelo de avaliação de desempenho de conselhos de saúde. O referencial teórico metodológico está fundamentado no método spidergram, adaptado à realidade dos conselhos de saúde. A matriz avaliativa considerou cinco dimensões de maior influência sobre a participação: autonomia, organização, representatividade, envolvimento comunitário e influência política. Com base na avaliação dos indicadores, foi estimado o valor de desempenho de cada dimensão e localizado no gráfico de cinco eixos. A aplicação da matriz foi realizada no Conselho de Saúde de Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brasil. Utilizou-se análise de documentos, observação das reuniões e entrevistas com 18 conselheiros como técnicas de coleta de dados. Os resultados demonstram nível avançado de autonomia do conselho com condições estruturais adequadas, porém, com limitações na independência financeira. A dimensão organização atingiu nível máximo de desempenho com a realização regular de reuniões, disponibilidade de informações para os conselheiros e funcionamento das comissões temáticas. A representatividade foi a dimensão de pior desempenho, demostrado pela frágil relação dos representantes com as entidades. A dimensão envolvimento comunitário apresentou nível avançado, com elevada participação de conselheiros e não conselheiros às reuniões e perfil de atuação propositivo. A dimensão influência política obteve nível intermediário. Constatou-se elevada influência dos representantes sociais no processo deliberativo e diminuta capacidade de acompanhamento das políticas. A matriz utilizada mostrou-se adequada e viável para a avaliação de desempenho dos conselhos de saúde.

El objetivo de este artículo es presentar y analizar los resultados de un modelo de evaluación de desempeño en consejos de salud. El marco referencial teórico metodológico se fundamentó en el método spidergram, adaptado a la realidad de los consejos de salud. La matriz evaluativa consideró las cinco dimensiones de mayor influencia sobre la participación: autonomía, organización, representatividad, implicación comunitaria e influencia política. A partir de la evaluación de los indicadores, se estimó el valor del desempeño de cada dimensión y se localizó en el gráfico con cinco ejes. La aplicación de la matriz se realizó en el Consejo de Salud de Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brasil. Se realizó un análisis de documentación, observación de reuniones y entrevistas con 18 consejeros, así como técnicas de recogida de datos. Los resultados demuestran un nivel avanzado de autonomía del consejo con condiciones estructurales adecuadas, aunque con limitaciones en la independencia financiera. La dimensión organización alcanzó el nivel máximo de desempeño con la realización regular de reuniones, disponibilidad de información para los consejeros y funcionamiento de las comisiones temáticas. La representatividad fue la dimensión de peor desempeño, demostrada por la frágil relación de los representantes con las entidades. La dimensión implicación comunitaria presentó un nivel avanzado con una elevada participación de consejeros y no consejeros en las reuniones y perfil de actuación propositivo. La dimensión influencia política obtuvo un nivel intermedio. Se constató una elevada influencia de los representantes sociales en el proceso deliberativo y una diminuta capacidad de seguimiento de las políticas. La matriz utilizada se mostró adecuada y útil para la evaluación de desempeño en los consejos de salud.

Expanding the Debate: Citizen Participation for the Implementation of the Right to Health in Brazil.

Brazil has established a well-known constitutional right to health. Legal scholars have focused largely on one aspect of this right: the role of the courts in enforcing health care access. Less attention has been paid to another aspect: citizens' right to participate in health planning. Participation is a constituent component of Brazil's right to health that is intended to guarantee accountability and fair resource distribution for improved population health. In this paper, drawing on constitutional analysis and interviews carried out for my doctoral research, I discuss Brazil's national-level participatory body, the National Health Council, and its potential for fostering accountability and balancing individual and societal interests in health policy. Effective participation, I contend, is a way to strengthen Brazil's health system to the benefit of the entire population, rather than only those who have access to the courts. This paper seeks to underline the constitutional requirement of participation as a core element of the realization of the right to health in Brazil and to invite other legal scholars to critically engage with the way in which Brazil's right to health is implemented.

The Norwegian National Council for Priority Setting in Health Care: decisions and justifications.

Different countries have adopted different strategies for tackling the challenge of allocating scarce health care resources fairly. Norway is one of the countries that has pioneered the effort to resolve priority setting by using a core set of priority-setting criteria. While the criteria themselves have been subject to extensive debate and numerous revisions, the question of how the criteria have been applied in practice has received less attention. In this paper, we examine how the criteria feature in the decisions and justifications of the Norwegian National Council for Priority Setting in Health Care, which has played an active role in deliberating about health care provision and coverage in Norway. We conducted a comprehensive document analysis, looking at the Council's decisions about health care allocation as well as the reasons they had provided to justify their decisions. We found that although the Council often made use of the official priority-setting criteria, they did so in an unsystematic and inconsistent manner.

The Drive towards Sustainable Health Systems Needs an Alignment: Where are the Innovations in Health Systems Planning?

Clarifying the healthcare innovation agenda is critical in order to advance the impact of system innovations. As part of this agenda-setting it is important to address the four conditions within which innovations can enhance system sustainability: 1) the innovation agenda reflects and is aligned with healthcare objectives and policy; 2) planning methodologies for services, workforce and funding are aligned with healthcare objectives and policy; 3) innovations in services are accommodated in systems through innovations in policy, planning and funding; and 4) innovations are systematically monitored and evaluated. In order to illustrate these conditions, the authors present a case study of an evaluation of one Canadian Health Authority's efforts to transform healthcare delivery. This case study reveals that aligning innovations in policy, planning, funding and health services is critical to transforming health systems and that, in the absence of such alignment, sustainable health systems are difficult to achieve.

Food Policy Council Self-Assessment Tool: Development, Testing, and Results.

A large number of food policy councils (FPCs) exist in the United States, Canada, and Tribal Nations (N = 278), yet there are no tools designed to measure their members' perceptions of organizational capacity, social capital, and council effectiveness. Without such tools, it is challenging to determine best practices for FPCs and to measure change within and across councils over time. This study describes the development, testing, and findings from the Food Policy Council Self-Assessment Tool (FPC-SAT). The assessment measures council practices and council members' perceptions of the following concepts: leadership, breadth of active membership, council climate, formality of council structure, knowledge sharing, relationships, member empowerment, community context, synergy, and impacts on the food system. All 278 FPCs listed on the Food Policy Network's Online Directory were recruited to complete the FPC-SAT. Internal reliability (Cronbach's α) and inter-rater reliability (AD, rWG(J), ICC [intraclass correlations][1], ICC[2]) were calculated, and exploratory and a confirmatory factor analyses were conducted. Responses from 354 FPC members from 94 councils were used to test the assessment. Cronbach's α ranged from 0.79 to 0.93 for the scales. FPC members reported the lowest mean scores on the breadth of active membership scale (2.49; standard deviation [SD], 0.62), indicating room for improvement, and highest on the leadership scale (3.45; SD, 0.45). The valid FPC-SAT can be used to identify FPC strengths and areas for improvement, measure differences across FPCs, and measure change in FPCs over time.

Pioneering a National Advanced Practice Leadership Council to Enhance Care Delivery in a Large 19-State Health System.

This article describes an innovative approach to enhancing the capacity of advanced practice clinicians (APCs) in a large faith-based health system consisting of multiple markets across the United States. With the challenges in health care today, promotion of advanced practice is vital to increasing quality and access to care while maintaining cost-effectiveness. The development of a national Advanced Practice Leadership Council led by the Vice President of Advanced Practice at Catholic Health Initiatives has been a progressive approach in mitigating the challenges facing APCs in today's health care arena. The success of the Council has led to its inclusion on the health system's national clinical governance structure. The authors discuss development of the Council along with specific information regarding various committee work, including APC state regulations, delineation of privileges, quality measures, and total compensation.

Food Policy Council Case Study Describing Cross-sector Collaboration for Food System Change in a Rural Setting.

PROBLEM: Food Policy Councils (FPCs) are cross-sector collaborations that bring representatives from across the food system together to identify issues, coordinate programs, and inform policy. Little is known about how rural FPCs operate to influence food access in their communities. PURPOSE: To explore how a rural FPC facilitates cross-sector partnerships and influences food system change through interviews with eight members of the Adam's County FPC. RESULTS: Connections developed through the FPC helped council members work more effectively in their home organizations. Four themes were discussed: council dynamics and structure; sharing resources, expertise, and information; promoting healthy food access through programs; and food policy opportunities and challenges. CONCLUSIONS: This case study illustrates connections between FPC members in a rural county and identifies how FPCs can facilitate food system change in their communities. Improving our understanding of how rural FPCs function can help to advance the potential public health impact of councils.

Civil society participation in the health system: the case of Brazil's Health Councils.

BACKGROUND: Brazil created Health Councils to bring together civil society groups, heath professionals, and government officials in the discussion of health policies and health system resource allocation. However, several studies have concluded that Health Councils are not very influential on healthcare policy. This study probes this issue further by providing a descriptive account of some of the challenges civil society face within Brazil's Health Councils. METHODS: Forty semi-structured interviews with Health Council Members at the municipal, state and national levels were conducted in June and July of 2013 and May of 2014. The geographical location of the interviewees covered all five regions of Brazil (North, Northeast, Midwest, Southeast, South) for a total of 5 different municipal Health Councils, 8 different state Health Councils, and the national Health Council in Brasilia. Interview data was analyzed using a thematic approach. RESULTS: Health Councils are limited by a lack of legal authority, which limits their ability to hold the government accountable for its health service performance, and thus hinders their ability to fulfill their mandate. Equally important, their membership guidelines create a limited level of inclusivity that seems to benefit only well-organized civil society groups. There is a reported lack of support and recognition from the relevant government that negatively affects the degree to which Health Council deliberations are implemented. Other deficiencies include an insufficient amount of resources for Health Council operations, and a lack of training for Health Council members. Lastly, strong individual interests among Health Council members tend to influence how members participate in Health Council discussions. CONCLUSIONS: Brazil's Health Councils fall short in providing an effective forum through which civil society can actively participate in health policy and resource allocation decision-making processes. Restrictive membership guidelines, a lack of autonomy from the government, vulnerability to government manipulation, a lack of support and recognition from the government and insufficient training and operational budgets have made Health Council largely a forum for consultation. Our conclusions highlight, that among other issues, Health Councils need to have the legal authority to act independently to promote government accountability, membership guidelines need to be revised in order include members of marginalized groups, and better training of civil society representatives is required to help them make more informed decisions.